Skip to main content

How to Explain Page View, Visitors & Visits (& Why Visits Is More Important)

In years of working with web analytics, I've had to try and explain the difference between page views, visitors and visits, and why people looking at basic stats should focus on visits. I can usually get the point across with the simple explanation and be pretty sure that people get it, but I once told a more involved (and more fun) story, and it seems that this story was the difference between a still-slightly-confused "Oh, okay" and what I got after this story, which was "Ohhh! Okay, now I understand it." With smiles.

The story:

Tom just moved into a new 4-room apartment and is exhausted. He just wants to spend the day sitting on the couch and watching the full season three of Mad Men that he has squirreled away on his DVR.

About fifteen minutes into the show, Tom's doorbell rings, so he has to stop the DVR and get up off the couch. It's his friend Kate, stopping by to pick up a DVD she's loaned Tom, so she only see's the front room as Tom picks up the DVD and hands it to her. She leaves. One visitor paying a visit with one room viewed.

An hour later, the doorbell rings again and Tom pulls himself up again (getting kind of annoyed now) and gets the door. It's his friend Cortney who's stopped by to see the apartment. Tom shows her the full apartment and she leaves. One visitor paying a visit with four rooms viewed.

A little while later, Greg stops by, but he's only interested in the new TV that Tom got, so he never leaves the living room. One visitor paying a visit with one room viewed.

Just as Tom wonders if he's going to get interrupted again, Kate comes by again and says, "I forgot to get a full tour of your new place!" He shows her around and she leaves. One returning visitor paying a visit with four rooms viewed.

So that's four visits paid by three different people, with ten views of the rooms. But why should Tom care more about how many visits were paid than the people who came by? Because it means he had to get up off the damn couch four times! They're all his friends, and once he's off the couch, the number of rooms he shows off doesn't make a difference, so really what matters to him at the end of the day is that his perfect, Mad Men-filled day was interrupted four times.

The apartment is a website, room views are page views, visitors are visitors, and visits paid are visits. Which is obvious, but this not only explains in a more real-world way the difference between the three, but also makes it clear why it's the initial visit that's the most basic measure of action: because we hate having to get up to do something when all we're trying to do is loaf.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why are we still judging work done by time spent?

Every morning, when I fill in the hours on my work's electronic timesheet, I'm struck by how odd it is that we're still judging our work by the time spent on it. It's odd because it's old-fashioned. In the paper and phone world, you could really only do work when you were at work. But we do work all the time now. I check my email when I first wake up. Does that mean I start my day at 6:30 am? Should that be reflected on my timesheet? How about when I respond to an email or check Basecamp when I'm on the bus? Does my work day start then? How about when I look at Google Analytics at night or think about email newsletters when I'm in the shower (which I'm somewhat ashamed to admit I did this morning)? On the other side, if someone finishes the work that they're meant to do, why should they feel like they need to stay at work until 5:00, just because that's the official time of the work day? I don't think anyone would argue that time spent ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Some scattered thoughts on the money of digital music

If you haven't already read Digital Audio Insider's interview with Camper Van Beethoven's Jonathan Segal ¹, it's a must read for anyone with even a slight interest in digital music and the money of the industry. Segal has tons of thoughts on just about every aspect of digital music, but best of all, he brings in these thoughts as someone whose initial music industry experience was in the days of purely-physical media, when "pirating" meant copying something onto a blank tape. My main takeway is general and obvious but an important reminder: we are in a transition time for music, and what it will become is anyone's guess. I think Segal's take on merchandise and live performances taking the place as artist's primary source of income as "asinine" is too harsh to be true, but I do think that we're in such a state of transition that any shot at predicting artistic income in the future is completely in the dark. Such predictions are really ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sentiment Measurement Beyond Metrics

You know, headlines like that one really put me on the fence, balancing between "Ooh! Metrics!" and "Wow, no wonder people think it's boring and geeky." ANYWAY...today I'm definitely in the former camp, in the sense that it's exciting because it's a philosophical puzzle: how can you solve a problem that can never really be solved? Yesterday, I commented on Avinash Kaushik's post where he asked, "If you were to measure the success of a company’s social media efforts how would you do it?" My answer: For social media, the obvious metrics still hold: referrals and conversions from referrals. But being from a nonprofit background, where the higher-ups are often skeptical of social media, the real metrics are the words. There’s nothing more valuable than the tweet that says "I love that {your org} is on Twitter" or the time you respond to a comment on Facebook addressing a wide concern about your organization or when you comment ...
Post a Comment
Read more