Skip to main content

What If Less Privacy Means More Freedom?

With the launch and demo of Google's Chrome OS, where the OS is the browser and all your information lives online, my head was in the cloud (HA! No? Oh, alright). As much as I love the move towards an online life--where information stays in one place and the only thing that changes is the devices we use to access it--it's hard not to take in the arguments that we're throwing our privacy away.

Playing the part of the skeptic (not too much of a stretch for me), it's not hard to see the concerns. Sure, at the moment there's nothing in my Google Docs or on my blogs that will put me in jail or get me blackmailed, but it's pretty easy to see a 9/11-type event or massive change in government that means more scrutiny on what we say and do. Our world can change in a big way, and what formerly seemed innocuous is now a crime, with all the evidence needed to convict available in the formerly-friendly-sounding cloud.

Meanwhile, the conspiracy theorists are sweeping the ashes of their burnt hard copies under the rug and going about their lives, which probably will involve embroidering a lovely "I Told You So" for their living room walls.

It seems extreme, but it's happened before, and recently. We tend to believe that we can only get more free, but it can get snuffed out all too easily. Look at Afghanistan in the 20th century, and now imagine that kind of crackdown when everything you've said it not only easy to find, but is traced to your name, address and even social security number.

And that's not even to mention smaller things like what your bosses or potential employers can find out about your, or what thieves of property or identity could use to more easily take things away from you. It happens.

But what if the flipside negates that? What if what we give up in privacy, we gain in freedom?

Yes, on the political front, having your opinions easily read as disobedience in a sudden government crackdown is chilling, but the ease and speed at which we can share stories in a wide broadcast means that it's a lot harder for authorities to disappear people. If one person knows about it, they can get it to everyone, and it doesn't even require convincing someone at the news station that it's a story worth airing. It's just aired, then and there by anyone who cares.

Yes, it's concerning how much a thief or other ill-intentioned individual could find out about just with access to your Google password, but by the exact same token, we have instant access to our accounts, can find out much more quickly when things have happened, and cut things off, often remotely. And even in these small cases, the ability to get advice and help from a community of the whole world means it's much easier to take action when it happens, and find out how to keep it from happening before it does.

There's still enough skeptic in me that I do sometimes suddenly get freaked out by how much of me is out in the cloud. But a deep breath of the wider picture usually brings me back to wanting as much of my life online--the easy-to-use, information-filled, convenient as all hell online world--as I can get.

The debate is open in the comments...if you aren't nervous about comments.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why you should be clicking the Google +1 button

One of the things that most makes me feel like I'm beating my head against a wall is when I'm trying to convince people to click reaction buttons like the Facebook Like button or Google +1 button on web pages. I think that most people just don't really think to do it when they read something that they like, but they should, because as Avinash Kaushik brilliantly termed it , it's applause.  Now, I kind of get why people shy away from the using the Facebook Like button: because it shows up on your Wall, has a chance to show up in people's stream and now shows up in the ticker. All of those things are great for people trying to promote their content and get more clicks, but it's not so great for those of us just trying to get feedback on what people are liking and if they're actually reading what we're writing. Even if you're not actively embarrassed to have people know that you like it, it just feels a little more intrusive than a lot of people wan...
Post a Comment
Read more

Some scattered thoughts on the money of digital music

If you haven't already read Digital Audio Insider's interview with Camper Van Beethoven's Jonathan Segal ¹, it's a must read for anyone with even a slight interest in digital music and the money of the industry. Segal has tons of thoughts on just about every aspect of digital music, but best of all, he brings in these thoughts as someone whose initial music industry experience was in the days of purely-physical media, when "pirating" meant copying something onto a blank tape. My main takeway is general and obvious but an important reminder: we are in a transition time for music, and what it will become is anyone's guess. I think Segal's take on merchandise and live performances taking the place as artist's primary source of income as "asinine" is too harsh to be true, but I do think that we're in such a state of transition that any shot at predicting artistic income in the future is completely in the dark. Such predictions are really ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why are we still judging work done by time spent?

Every morning, when I fill in the hours on my work's electronic timesheet, I'm struck by how odd it is that we're still judging our work by the time spent on it. It's odd because it's old-fashioned. In the paper and phone world, you could really only do work when you were at work. But we do work all the time now. I check my email when I first wake up. Does that mean I start my day at 6:30 am? Should that be reflected on my timesheet? How about when I respond to an email or check Basecamp when I'm on the bus? Does my work day start then? How about when I look at Google Analytics at night or think about email newsletters when I'm in the shower (which I'm somewhat ashamed to admit I did this morning)? On the other side, if someone finishes the work that they're meant to do, why should they feel like they need to stay at work until 5:00, just because that's the official time of the work day? I don't think anyone would argue that time spent ...
Post a Comment
Read more