Skip to main content

Fixing The Feedburner/Google Analytics Campaigns

How many people you think they got working on that Feedburner thing over there? One? Half? A summer intern? A guy who works on it while he watches football?

The flaws and problems with Feedburner have been frustrating to say the least, so I was pretty damn excited when, a little over a month ago, Feedburner finally announced that they were integrating the ability to add in Google Analytics campaign data to the end of feed item URLs. This was huge. Before this, you had to add in the string into the original RSS feed, which most of us couldn't do since we didn't have access to that original feed, but wanted to track when people were coming from our feeds.

My excitement ended, though, when I cranked up the feature and saw what it did to my stats. Yes, it was helpful to see who came from Google Reader or Bloglines, but if the content was syndicated, it stripped out the referrer. This was a problem with my music blog. Hype Machine is by far and away our #1 referrer, and when I implemented this change, the clicks from there went to almost none, because the campaign source was hard-coded in there as "feedburner". Which was not helpful at all. If the campaign is already "Feed: {etc}", then what does having the source as "feedburner" tell you? Nothing, that's what.

My Solution
When the campaign feature was first announced, I noticed an interesting dynamic code in the "content" area: ${distributionEndpoint}. This made much more sense in the source area, so I put it there instead of "feedburner", only to find that the only distribution endpoints that Feedburner acknowledged were Google Reader, Google Feedfetcher and Bloglines. Now, wouldn't it just make sense to have this include whatever site referred it? Yes. But that's Feedburner for you.

But what happens when it doesn't acknowledge one of those few endpoints is that it just leaves it blank. So what I did, see, is to go ahead and put ${distributionEndpoint} in the source, so that when the feed doesn't find Hype Machine (which it probably won't for a while) or any of the other endpoints that it won't find, it just uses the referring site as the source like normal. And my referrals from Hype Machine are back to where they were.

By the way, I hate to badmouth Feedburner so much. It really is a really good service. But I get really frustrated with some of the half-assed implementation that Feedburner (among other Google properties) implements, suggesting that the services are not really much of a priority for Google.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Some scattered thoughts on the money of digital music

If you haven't already read Digital Audio Insider's interview with Camper Van Beethoven's Jonathan Segal ¹, it's a must read for anyone with even a slight interest in digital music and the money of the industry. Segal has tons of thoughts on just about every aspect of digital music, but best of all, he brings in these thoughts as someone whose initial music industry experience was in the days of purely-physical media, when "pirating" meant copying something onto a blank tape. My main takeway is general and obvious but an important reminder: we are in a transition time for music, and what it will become is anyone's guess. I think Segal's take on merchandise and live performances taking the place as artist's primary source of income as "asinine" is too harsh to be true, but I do think that we're in such a state of transition that any shot at predicting artistic income in the future is completely in the dark. Such predictions are really ...

Why Google+'s Circles doesn't fix anything

One of the biggest advantages of social media-style communication is the ability for your audience to choose itself rather than for you to assume interests and choose the audience yourself, likely leaving out people that would be interested. Anyone who's started a blog knows the surprise in finding that the people who read it religiously are the people you never would have thought would be interested, while many of those people that you thought would read every word never look at it. Likewise with Facebook, where many of the people I interact with are old friends from the past who have turned out to be surprisingly funny and interesting, whereas closer friends are never to be heard from. The flip side of this is email, where every "To" box requires you to decide who your audience is. That's all fine and well when you just need to get through to one person, but when sending information to larger groups, how do you know you're not leaving out the people who...