Skip to main content

A big reason I'm interested in tech? Because it solves problems

A Facebook yesterday had a friend of mine pleading rhetorically to a cell phone not to die because if it did, she would lose all the pictures and video she had of her youngest child. This blew my mind. How could you only have pictures of your child on a phone? Why wouldn't you download and back them up? When you know that the internet often (almost always?) has easy solutions to your problems, why wouldn't you search for those solutions?

I'm a guy who's tech support and tech recommender for his fiance* and family, but it's not because I'm a deeply technical engineer type. I know the answers to these questions because I know that computers and the internet often have a way of improving them, and so I go and look for them. Often, these problems aren't even ones that need to be solved, but just ones of convenience. Mint drastically improved my financial life and Dropbox improved backup and transfer. But I looked for them not because I needed to or because I'm fascinated with technology (though, relatively, I am) but because I know that the solutions are out there.

What it really comes down to is even thinking of these things as "tech". Lumping it like that allows people to think that they're not "techy" and so they wouldn't know how to do these things. They would, though, and they don't need complicated technical thinking. They just need the curiosity.

* less than a week left of using this word

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Some scattered thoughts on the money of digital music

If you haven't already read Digital Audio Insider's interview with Camper Van Beethoven's Jonathan Segal ¹, it's a must read for anyone with even a slight interest in digital music and the money of the industry. Segal has tons of thoughts on just about every aspect of digital music, but best of all, he brings in these thoughts as someone whose initial music industry experience was in the days of purely-physical media, when "pirating" meant copying something onto a blank tape. My main takeway is general and obvious but an important reminder: we are in a transition time for music, and what it will become is anyone's guess. I think Segal's take on merchandise and live performances taking the place as artist's primary source of income as "asinine" is too harsh to be true, but I do think that we're in such a state of transition that any shot at predicting artistic income in the future is completely in the dark. Such predictions are really ...

Why Google+'s Circles doesn't fix anything

One of the biggest advantages of social media-style communication is the ability for your audience to choose itself rather than for you to assume interests and choose the audience yourself, likely leaving out people that would be interested. Anyone who's started a blog knows the surprise in finding that the people who read it religiously are the people you never would have thought would be interested, while many of those people that you thought would read every word never look at it. Likewise with Facebook, where many of the people I interact with are old friends from the past who have turned out to be surprisingly funny and interesting, whereas closer friends are never to be heard from. The flip side of this is email, where every "To" box requires you to decide who your audience is. That's all fine and well when you just need to get through to one person, but when sending information to larger groups, how do you know you're not leaving out the people who...