Skip to main content

Don't get duped by complexity just because it comes from "experts" ((tag:business))

At one point in my dad's career, he was involved in purchasing HR services for his company. If the people selling the service couldn't explain the service to the point where my dad and the other people doing the purchasing couldn't understand it, they wouldn't buy it.

It seems like an obvious move, but it's actually pretty brave. How often do we agree to something that we don't fully understand because it's pitched to us by "experts"? And before you answer, do you have a mortgage? Or insurance of any kind? Or investments? And you fully read and understand the terms of all those internet services you sign up for, right?

Straddling the line between being afraid to look dumb and trusting the people who you expect to be knowledgeable, we agree to many things we don't understand. This is the main point of Michael Lewis' excellent book on the financial crisis The Big Short: complex schemes were put into place that weren't understood even by the people that championed them, and a questioning few recognized that complexity couldn't work, stuck through years of ridicule for their questioning, and ultimately profited big.

We have to agree to a lot of things without fully understanding just to carry on with our lives. You can only hope that you're not being duped. But there's a lot of times where we should suck it up and pester with questions that might make us look dumb until the concept is clear. Make people explain things to you until you get it. If they can't do it, something's wrong.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Some scattered thoughts on the money of digital music

If you haven't already read Digital Audio Insider's interview with Camper Van Beethoven's Jonathan Segal ¹, it's a must read for anyone with even a slight interest in digital music and the money of the industry. Segal has tons of thoughts on just about every aspect of digital music, but best of all, he brings in these thoughts as someone whose initial music industry experience was in the days of purely-physical media, when "pirating" meant copying something onto a blank tape. My main takeway is general and obvious but an important reminder: we are in a transition time for music, and what it will become is anyone's guess. I think Segal's take on merchandise and live performances taking the place as artist's primary source of income as "asinine" is too harsh to be true, but I do think that we're in such a state of transition that any shot at predicting artistic income in the future is completely in the dark. Such predictions are really ...

Why Google+'s Circles doesn't fix anything

One of the biggest advantages of social media-style communication is the ability for your audience to choose itself rather than for you to assume interests and choose the audience yourself, likely leaving out people that would be interested. Anyone who's started a blog knows the surprise in finding that the people who read it religiously are the people you never would have thought would be interested, while many of those people that you thought would read every word never look at it. Likewise with Facebook, where many of the people I interact with are old friends from the past who have turned out to be surprisingly funny and interesting, whereas closer friends are never to be heard from. The flip side of this is email, where every "To" box requires you to decide who your audience is. That's all fine and well when you just need to get through to one person, but when sending information to larger groups, how do you know you're not leaving out the people who...