Skip to main content

Four thoughts on the new Google +1

Google launched it's +1 button for search last week. Have you started using it yet? Here's a few initial thoughts:
  1. It's about damn time. Google could have done a Like button-type function a long time ago, at least hooked into Google Reader. But they let Facebook beat them to it, and now they're way behind.
  2. It's an oddly vague name...for Google anyway. Google gives things plain but quickly descriptive names, and it's kind of strange that they went with something that's lingo to geeky commenters. I guess they didn't really want to go straight up against the Facebook Like button, but it seems like less geeky web users are less likely to glaze over it, having no idea what it's for. And those are the people that Google would need clicking the button to make it truly successful.
  3. Publishers will have almost no choice but use it. While Google says that +1 clicks won't affect search rank, the fact that these votes will end up on search results pages means that websites will really need users to click those buttons on the place they trust: their site. Once the embeddable version shows up, it'll be everywhere.
  4. Google is getting really pushy about privacy. Make no mistake: Facebook, Twitter and Google all desperately want everyone to be completely publish. Their profits depend on it. But where Facebook has (reluctantly, maybe) improved privacy when they meet resistance and Twitter has given users incentive to be public, Google has shown increasing disregard for people's desire to control their own privacy. I hope it's just due to Google's practice of releasing half-baked products, but I increasingly think that Google is using our reliance on their products as a way to force us public.
If you haven't turned it on yet and are curious enough, you can turn it on a google.com/experimental/.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Some scattered thoughts on the money of digital music

If you haven't already read Digital Audio Insider's interview with Camper Van Beethoven's Jonathan Segal ¹, it's a must read for anyone with even a slight interest in digital music and the money of the industry. Segal has tons of thoughts on just about every aspect of digital music, but best of all, he brings in these thoughts as someone whose initial music industry experience was in the days of purely-physical media, when "pirating" meant copying something onto a blank tape. My main takeway is general and obvious but an important reminder: we are in a transition time for music, and what it will become is anyone's guess. I think Segal's take on merchandise and live performances taking the place as artist's primary source of income as "asinine" is too harsh to be true, but I do think that we're in such a state of transition that any shot at predicting artistic income in the future is completely in the dark. Such predictions are really ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Google+'s Circles doesn't fix anything

One of the biggest advantages of social media-style communication is the ability for your audience to choose itself rather than for you to assume interests and choose the audience yourself, likely leaving out people that would be interested. Anyone who's started a blog knows the surprise in finding that the people who read it religiously are the people you never would have thought would be interested, while many of those people that you thought would read every word never look at it. Likewise with Facebook, where many of the people I interact with are old friends from the past who have turned out to be surprisingly funny and interesting, whereas closer friends are never to be heard from. The flip side of this is email, where every "To" box requires you to decide who your audience is. That's all fine and well when you just need to get through to one person, but when sending information to larger groups, how do you know you're not leaving out the people who...
6 comments
Read more