Skip to main content

These days, it's easy to get deep details and hard to find the basics

I went to bed last night reminding myself to DVR the royal wedding for my wife on Saturday morning and check what time the NFL draft started later on Saturday afternoon. I woke up, of course, to find that the wedding was this morning and the draft started last night. I joked to a friend that at least my ignorance is well-rounded.

When I realized how off I was on these, though, the first thing that jumped to mind was how did I miss that? For at least a month, I've been bombarded with columns, opinions, excitement and mock drafts (only for the NFL...didn't see any wedding mock drafts), and yet nowhere in that information was anything about "tonight" or "tomorrow".

It's a strange effect of our current connected world: it's easy to get details and debate, but it's often hard to get the basics. I was at a conference for a few days last year and was out of touch on news, and when I came back, I was hearing tons about Derek Jeter and Christine O'Donnell. I could find tons of columns and deep analysis on both of them, but I couldn't find out for the life of me why people were suddenly talking about them. Derek Jeter had "cheated", but I couldn't find out how and Christine O'Donnell...well, a lot of people had opinions on her, but it took me a surprisingly long time to out who she was or what she had done in the past few days to suddenly warrant so much attention.

The internet certainly isn't at a loss for depth. We can find anything we want at anytime. But in the constant blizzard of statuses and tweets, it's amazing how often and how quickly the basics of a matter get lost.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Some scattered thoughts on the money of digital music

If you haven't already read Digital Audio Insider's interview with Camper Van Beethoven's Jonathan Segal ¹, it's a must read for anyone with even a slight interest in digital music and the money of the industry. Segal has tons of thoughts on just about every aspect of digital music, but best of all, he brings in these thoughts as someone whose initial music industry experience was in the days of purely-physical media, when "pirating" meant copying something onto a blank tape. My main takeway is general and obvious but an important reminder: we are in a transition time for music, and what it will become is anyone's guess. I think Segal's take on merchandise and live performances taking the place as artist's primary source of income as "asinine" is too harsh to be true, but I do think that we're in such a state of transition that any shot at predicting artistic income in the future is completely in the dark. Such predictions are really ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Google+'s Circles doesn't fix anything

One of the biggest advantages of social media-style communication is the ability for your audience to choose itself rather than for you to assume interests and choose the audience yourself, likely leaving out people that would be interested. Anyone who's started a blog knows the surprise in finding that the people who read it religiously are the people you never would have thought would be interested, while many of those people that you thought would read every word never look at it. Likewise with Facebook, where many of the people I interact with are old friends from the past who have turned out to be surprisingly funny and interesting, whereas closer friends are never to be heard from. The flip side of this is email, where every "To" box requires you to decide who your audience is. That's all fine and well when you just need to get through to one person, but when sending information to larger groups, how do you know you're not leaving out the people who...
6 comments
Read more