Skip to main content

Why I think pulling the Google Reader share function is a huge mistake

Sometime this week (supposedly), Google Reader is going to lose its social feature to Google Plus. This is a damn shame, since the People You Follow space has been, hands down, THE best social sharing tool I've ever used. In fairness, I think that Reader has been as great as it has been because the number of people I knew who used it was a pretty small group that was limited mostly to my closest friends who have a great deal of insight and share judiciously. But I also love Reader in that it's extremely easy to share, easy to comment, and easy to control privacy, all on articles that you often don't have to leave the interface to read in their entirety.

Some of my Reader friends have taken this news pretty hard, and that was my first impression (and really, second through sixth as well), but I'm kind of curious to see what the Plus integration will hold. It's possible that, a month or two from now, we'll be raving about how great Plus is for sharing articles from Reader. But while I hold a little bit of hope, my guess is that it'll pale in comparison:
  1. It's most likely that sharing from Reader will now be much more like using the "Send to" feature, which is several extra steps, enough to lower the number of things people share.
  2. Articles will just be shared in their snippet form, rather than being able to read the full article like you can now do on shares in Reader.
  3. With Circles, people will no longer be able to request that you share your Reader articles with them. You have to decide who sees your articles up front, meaning you'll be likely to miss some people who would be great to share with. It's that huge flaw of Circles rearing its head again.
The one thing that really bugs me about this is that Google is making the huge mistake of trying to force Plus on people. There's no reason that they couldn't have kept the sharing functionality in Reader exactly the same way while also allowing your shared articles (and comments) to go over to Plus as well, the same way it used to work in Buzz, with the comments showing up in both places. This would have left the great Reader experience intact while also allowing a ton of new content to start flowing into Plus.

In other words, rather than focusing on making Plus the best product it can be, they're pulling the plug on everything else so that it's the only product there is. 

Comments

  1. As a faithful reader of stuff you share, Reid, I really enjoyed this piece. Integration with G+, though, seems not only inevitable, but necessary. Cross yer fingers and hope they pull it off right.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Totally agree that it's inevitable and necessary to integrate Reader with Plus. In fact, it's something that I've wanted since Plus first came around, and was surprised it wasn't there from the beginning. It would instantly add a ton more shared content to Plus.

    The mistake that they're making is in shutting off Reader's sharing capabilities entirely. They should have done what they did with Buzz: the shares and comments simply go to both places, and you could either choose to have your shared articles go to Buzz or not. Simple and effective.

    At the moment, Plus is, at best, an immature product and at worse, a deeply flawed product (I think). Either way, pushing people over to the product before it's ready to support the kinds of conversations we've been having on Reader for years is just a flat-out dumb decision.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why are we still judging work done by time spent?

Every morning, when I fill in the hours on my work's electronic timesheet, I'm struck by how odd it is that we're still judging our work by the time spent on it. It's odd because it's old-fashioned. In the paper and phone world, you could really only do work when you were at work. But we do work all the time now. I check my email when I first wake up. Does that mean I start my day at 6:30 am? Should that be reflected on my timesheet? How about when I respond to an email or check Basecamp when I'm on the bus? Does my work day start then? How about when I look at Google Analytics at night or think about email newsletters when I'm in the shower (which I'm somewhat ashamed to admit I did this morning)? On the other side, if someone finishes the work that they're meant to do, why should they feel like they need to stay at work until 5:00, just because that's the official time of the work day? I don't think anyone would argue that time spent ...

Some scattered thoughts on the money of digital music

If you haven't already read Digital Audio Insider's interview with Camper Van Beethoven's Jonathan Segal ¹, it's a must read for anyone with even a slight interest in digital music and the money of the industry. Segal has tons of thoughts on just about every aspect of digital music, but best of all, he brings in these thoughts as someone whose initial music industry experience was in the days of purely-physical media, when "pirating" meant copying something onto a blank tape. My main takeway is general and obvious but an important reminder: we are in a transition time for music, and what it will become is anyone's guess. I think Segal's take on merchandise and live performances taking the place as artist's primary source of income as "asinine" is too harsh to be true, but I do think that we're in such a state of transition that any shot at predicting artistic income in the future is completely in the dark. Such predictions are really ...

Sentiment Measurement Beyond Metrics

You know, headlines like that one really put me on the fence, balancing between "Ooh! Metrics!" and "Wow, no wonder people think it's boring and geeky." ANYWAY...today I'm definitely in the former camp, in the sense that it's exciting because it's a philosophical puzzle: how can you solve a problem that can never really be solved? Yesterday, I commented on Avinash Kaushik's post where he asked, "If you were to measure the success of a company’s social media efforts how would you do it?" My answer: For social media, the obvious metrics still hold: referrals and conversions from referrals. But being from a nonprofit background, where the higher-ups are often skeptical of social media, the real metrics are the words. There’s nothing more valuable than the tweet that says "I love that {your org} is on Twitter" or the time you respond to a comment on Facebook addressing a wide concern about your organization or when you comment ...