Skip to main content

The new Google Analytics: mostly cosmetic with one HUGE change

Let's just get this out of the way first: I get excited by new Google Analytics features. Happy now? I'm a big geek. Lets move on.

It came out of the blue today to hear that Google Analytics was going to release "version five" (I didn't even know that there were versions) and was about to start testing. The official Analytics blog gave no details, but the Analytics Talk blog did. Among the new features:
  • New layout on the dashboard and more data crunching available in the widgets
  • Updated custom reports (though I've never used custom reports, so this just got a "meh" from me. If you have a suggestion for a useful custom report, comment away)
  • New visualizations, including motion charts within the reports and a term cloud visualization which seems like it may either be really useful or totally worthless
  • Renaming and reorganization of many of the metrics, which seems to be to encourage low-to-medium users as well as just logical, inevitable changes
But the HUGE change is that they'll now allow events to be set as goals. Previously, you had to have a page view to trigger a goal, which meant that all that useful event data was just sitting way off at the side. But now it'll be tons easier to have downloads and link clicks count as goals without it affecting your page views. From the looks of it, it also seems like you'll have more control over when a goal is triggered, though I can't tell if that's just for the events as goals or all goals.

The one thing that I'm concerned about is if the URLs will change along with the name changes to some of the metrics. I use an antiquated-but-useful method of importing stats from into Excel from Analytics that depends on the export report URL, and if it changes those URLs, it'll break my reports. I do realize that I should probably be using the API anyway, but I have a lot of time put into those reports, and I'd hate to see them all break.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Some scattered thoughts on the money of digital music

If you haven't already read Digital Audio Insider's interview with Camper Van Beethoven's Jonathan Segal ¹, it's a must read for anyone with even a slight interest in digital music and the money of the industry. Segal has tons of thoughts on just about every aspect of digital music, but best of all, he brings in these thoughts as someone whose initial music industry experience was in the days of purely-physical media, when "pirating" meant copying something onto a blank tape. My main takeway is general and obvious but an important reminder: we are in a transition time for music, and what it will become is anyone's guess. I think Segal's take on merchandise and live performances taking the place as artist's primary source of income as "asinine" is too harsh to be true, but I do think that we're in such a state of transition that any shot at predicting artistic income in the future is completely in the dark. Such predictions are really ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Google+'s Circles doesn't fix anything

One of the biggest advantages of social media-style communication is the ability for your audience to choose itself rather than for you to assume interests and choose the audience yourself, likely leaving out people that would be interested. Anyone who's started a blog knows the surprise in finding that the people who read it religiously are the people you never would have thought would be interested, while many of those people that you thought would read every word never look at it. Likewise with Facebook, where many of the people I interact with are old friends from the past who have turned out to be surprisingly funny and interesting, whereas closer friends are never to be heard from. The flip side of this is email, where every "To" box requires you to decide who your audience is. That's all fine and well when you just need to get through to one person, but when sending information to larger groups, how do you know you're not leaving out the people who...
6 comments
Read more