Skip to main content

The new Google Analytics: mostly cosmetic with one HUGE change

Let's just get this out of the way first: I get excited by new Google Analytics features. Happy now? I'm a big geek. Lets move on.

It came out of the blue today to hear that Google Analytics was going to release "version five" (I didn't even know that there were versions) and was about to start testing. The official Analytics blog gave no details, but the Analytics Talk blog did. Among the new features:
  • New layout on the dashboard and more data crunching available in the widgets
  • Updated custom reports (though I've never used custom reports, so this just got a "meh" from me. If you have a suggestion for a useful custom report, comment away)
  • New visualizations, including motion charts within the reports and a term cloud visualization which seems like it may either be really useful or totally worthless
  • Renaming and reorganization of many of the metrics, which seems to be to encourage low-to-medium users as well as just logical, inevitable changes
But the HUGE change is that they'll now allow events to be set as goals. Previously, you had to have a page view to trigger a goal, which meant that all that useful event data was just sitting way off at the side. But now it'll be tons easier to have downloads and link clicks count as goals without it affecting your page views. From the looks of it, it also seems like you'll have more control over when a goal is triggered, though I can't tell if that's just for the events as goals or all goals.

The one thing that I'm concerned about is if the URLs will change along with the name changes to some of the metrics. I use an antiquated-but-useful method of importing stats from into Excel from Analytics that depends on the export report URL, and if it changes those URLs, it'll break my reports. I do realize that I should probably be using the API anyway, but I have a lot of time put into those reports, and I'd hate to see them all break.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why you should be clicking the Google +1 button

One of the things that most makes me feel like I'm beating my head against a wall is when I'm trying to convince people to click reaction buttons like the Facebook Like button or Google +1 button on web pages. I think that most people just don't really think to do it when they read something that they like, but they should, because as Avinash Kaushik brilliantly termed it , it's applause.  Now, I kind of get why people shy away from the using the Facebook Like button: because it shows up on your Wall, has a chance to show up in people's stream and now shows up in the ticker. All of those things are great for people trying to promote their content and get more clicks, but it's not so great for those of us just trying to get feedback on what people are liking and if they're actually reading what we're writing. Even if you're not actively embarrassed to have people know that you like it, it just feels a little more intrusive than a lot of people wan...
Post a Comment
Read more

Some scattered thoughts on the money of digital music

If you haven't already read Digital Audio Insider's interview with Camper Van Beethoven's Jonathan Segal ¹, it's a must read for anyone with even a slight interest in digital music and the money of the industry. Segal has tons of thoughts on just about every aspect of digital music, but best of all, he brings in these thoughts as someone whose initial music industry experience was in the days of purely-physical media, when "pirating" meant copying something onto a blank tape. My main takeway is general and obvious but an important reminder: we are in a transition time for music, and what it will become is anyone's guess. I think Segal's take on merchandise and live performances taking the place as artist's primary source of income as "asinine" is too harsh to be true, but I do think that we're in such a state of transition that any shot at predicting artistic income in the future is completely in the dark. Such predictions are really ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why are we still judging work done by time spent?

Every morning, when I fill in the hours on my work's electronic timesheet, I'm struck by how odd it is that we're still judging our work by the time spent on it. It's odd because it's old-fashioned. In the paper and phone world, you could really only do work when you were at work. But we do work all the time now. I check my email when I first wake up. Does that mean I start my day at 6:30 am? Should that be reflected on my timesheet? How about when I respond to an email or check Basecamp when I'm on the bus? Does my work day start then? How about when I look at Google Analytics at night or think about email newsletters when I'm in the shower (which I'm somewhat ashamed to admit I did this morning)? On the other side, if someone finishes the work that they're meant to do, why should they feel like they need to stay at work until 5:00, just because that's the official time of the work day? I don't think anyone would argue that time spent ...
Post a Comment
Read more